Verified Client Outcomes · Q4 2025
Last Quarter
37%

reduction in patient wait time

across 14 primary care sites

Last Quarter
2.4 hrs

recovered per provider per day

through EHR handoff restructuring

Last Quarter
91%

staff adoption within 60 days

zero mandatory retraining sessions

These are last quarter's results. Yours are next.

Book a Workflow Diagnosis

Clinical Case Studies

Recognize your facility. Understand the fix.

Each engagement below is a real workflow diagnosis — presenting problem, root cause assessment, intervention protocol, and measured outcome. Structured like a consult report written for your facility.

01

Solo Practice

Greenbrook Family Medicine

Portland, OR · 1 physician, 3 staff

Presenting Problem

A single-physician internal medicine practice with a 34% no-show rate and a provider spending 3.1 hours per day in the EHR after clinic hours. The physician had tried two scheduling software switches in 18 months. Neither touched the underlying problem: appointment slot design was misaligned with actual visit-type demand, and EHR note templates had never been configured for the practice's actual patient mix.

Diagnostic Assessment

Slot structure was built for a theoretical patient rather than the actual panel. 62% of visits were follow-up chronic care appointments being booked into new-patient slots. Rooming sequences had five unnecessary steps. The physician was documenting from memory at end-of-day rather than at point-of-care.

Intervention Protocol

  • Redesigned 4-week appointment template based on 18 months of actual visit-type data
  • Rebuilt EHR note templates with pre-populated chronic condition frameworks
  • Introduced same-day hold slots to absorb acute demand without disrupting schedule
  • Implemented rooming checklist that pre-stages chart before physician entry

Measured Outcomes

No-show rate34% → 11%
After-hours charting3.1 → 0.7 hrs
Panel capacity+4 pts/day

I'd been blaming myself for being slow. Turns out my templates were fighting me every single visit.

Dr. Sarah Whitfield

Family Medicine, Portland

Book a Workflow Diagnosis
02

Multi-Provider Group

Cascade Orthopaedics & Rehab

Seattle, WA · 8 physicians, 22 staff

Presenting Problem

An 8-provider orthopedic group migrated to a new EHR 14 months prior. Throughput had declined 22% and never recovered. Post-surgical follow-up visits were running 40 minutes over schedule on average. Staff were manually reconciling between the old and new system for any patient with records predating the migration. Two providers had hired personal scribes as a workaround.

Diagnostic Assessment

The EHR migration had been completed technically but not clinically. Workflow sequences were copied from the old system rather than redesigned. Surgeons' post-op note structures required 14 manual clicks for information the system could auto-populate. The dual-system reconciliation was consuming 1.8 staff hours per day per front-desk employee.

Intervention Protocol

  • Audited all 47 active note templates against actual documentation requirements
  • Rebuilt post-surgical follow-up workflow to reduce click burden by 68%
  • Designed single-source data migration protocol eliminating manual reconciliation
  • Created role-specific quick-reference cards for each staff position
  • Ran 3 department-wide workflow labs — no mandatory retraining sessions

Measured Outcomes

Throughput recovery+19%
Schedule overrun avg.40 → 8 min
Daily reconciliation1.8 → 0.2 hrs

We spent $380,000 on the EHR implementation. Triage spent six weeks and gave us back what we paid for.

Jennifer Nakamura, COO

Cascade Orthopaedics & Rehab

Book a Workflow Diagnosis
03

Hospital System

Meridian Regional Medical Center

Denver, CO · 340-bed facility, 4 departments

Presenting Problem

A regional hospital's ED was boarding patients an average of 4.2 hours past disposition. The medical-surgical floor had a 31% avoidable delay rate on discharges. Bed management was operating on a 2-hour reporting cycle, making real-time allocation impossible. Three department heads were managing staffing allocations in separate spreadsheets that didn't communicate.

Diagnostic Assessment

Bed management visibility was the structural failure. Dispositioned patients were waiting for beds that had been cleaned but not yet marked available in the system — a communication gap averaging 47 minutes per bed. Discharge planning was initiated at the time of discharge rather than at admission. Staffing decisions were being made on 4-hour-old data.

Intervention Protocol

  • Implemented real-time bed status communication protocol between nursing and EVS
  • Redesigned discharge planning trigger to fire at admission for surgical cases
  • Built unified staffing dashboard pulling from all three department spreadsheets
  • Established 30-minute bed management huddle cadence with standardized data format
  • Trained charge nurses on predictive census modeling using existing EMR data

Measured Outcomes

ED boarding time4.2 → 1.6 hrs
Avoidable discharge delays31% → 9%
Annual capacity value+$2.1M

We had the data. We had the staff. We just couldn't see the whole board at once. Now we can.

Dr. Thomas Reeves

Chief of Emergency Medicine, Meridian Regional

Book a Workflow Diagnosis

Our Diagnostic Method

Every engagement follows four clinical phases.

We don't arrive with a pre-written playbook. We diagnose before we prescribe — and we measure every outcome against a documented baseline.

01

Intake Assessment

Week 1

We shadow your actual workflow — not the one documented in your SOPs. Time-motion studies, EHR click audits, and staff interviews surface the invisible bottlenecks your system has adapted around.

Workflow Diagnostic Report with ranked friction points

02

Protocol Design

Weeks 2–3

We design interventions against your specific panel composition, payer mix, and technology stack. Nothing is lifted from a template. Every protocol is built for your facility's actual patient population.

Intervention Protocol with implementation sequencing

03

Guided Implementation

Weeks 4–8

We run workflow labs — not mandatory retraining. Staff learn new sequences in the context of their actual roles. Change is introduced incrementally to prevent adoption fatigue.

Role-specific workflow guides + live system configuration

04

Measured Outcomes

Week 8–12

We return at 30 and 60 days to measure against baseline. If adoption is below 85% or throughput hasn't improved by the projected range, we stay — at no additional cost.

Outcomes Report with variance analysis

The 85% Adoption Guarantee

If staff adoption is below 85% at 60 days or throughput hasn't improved by the projected range, we return for an additional implementation round at no cost.

Book a Workflow Diagnosis

200+

Clinic engagements

14

Health systems served

60 days

Avg. to measurable improvement

$0

Cost if targets not met

Primary Care AllianceMeridian HealthCascade OrthopaedicsGreenbrook MedicineValley Medical GroupSummit Health PartnersEastside PediatricsPacific Rehab NetworkPrimary Care AllianceMeridian HealthCascade OrthopaedicsGreenbrook MedicineValley Medical GroupSummit Health PartnersEastside PediatricsPacific Rehab Network

"We'd tried two consultants before Triage. Both gave us frameworks. Triage gave us a working clinic. The difference is they don't leave until the whiteboard makes sense."

RK

Rachel Kim, MBA

VP Operations · Valley Medical Group · 11 sites

6 wks

To full adoption

23%

Throughput increase

98%

Staff satisfaction score

Start the Engagement

Two paths in. Both lead to clarity.

Book a Workflow Diagnosis

45-minute intake call · No obligation

A consultant will reach out within 1 business day to confirm timing.

Clinic Efficiency Audit Checklist

A 47-point diagnostic tool covering patient flow, EHR configuration, staffing rhythms, and revenue cycle — built from 200+ clinic engagements.

Delivered instantly to your inbox. No sales follow-up without your consent.

Checklist covers

  • Appointment template alignment
  • EHR click burden audit
  • Rooming sequence efficiency
  • No-show pattern analysis
  • Staffing rhythm mapping
  • Revenue cycle lag points